Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa
Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa,[1] an important case in South African law, was heard in the Constitutional Court[2] on May 20, 2009, with judgment handed down on July 22, 2009.
Facts
The court had to determine whether Parliament and the President had failed in their exclusive constitutional obligation to enact legislation governing Muslim marriages.
Judgment
The court found that the obligation in fact did not fall exclusively on Parliament and the President, and that, in terms of the Constitution,[3] the court did not have exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the application.
The question, therefore, of whether or not Parliament and the President are under an obligation (even if not exclusive) to recognise Muslim marriage, and whether or not such legislation would be consistent with the Constitution,[4][5][6][7] went unanswered.
June 2022
A second case with this title was heard on 5 August 2021 and decided on 28 June 2022.[8]
See also
References
Cases
- Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 (6) SA 94 (CC).
Notes
- ^ 2009 (6) SA 94 (CC).
- ^ Langa CJ, Moseneke DCJ, Cameron J, Mokgoro J, Ngcobo J, Nkabinde J, O'regan J, Sachs J, Skweyiya J and Yacoob J.
- ^ s 167(4)(e).
- ^ s 9.
- ^ s 10.
- ^ s 15.
- ^ s 31.
- ^ "Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (CCT 24/21) [2022] ZACC 23 (28 June 2022)". www.saflii.org. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
 | This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Justapedia by expanding it. |