Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 10, 1928 Decided May 14, 1928 | |
Full case name | Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands |
Citations | 277 U.S. 189 (more) |
Holding | |
The legislative power does not include the power to appoint the agents charged with enforcing the law. Executive powers may not be attached to a legislative office. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Sutherland, joined by Taft, Devanter, Butler, Sanford, Stone |
Dissent | Holmes, joined by Brandeis |
Dissent | McReynolds |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2 |
Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands, 277 U.S. 189 (1928), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.
References
External links
- Text of Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands, 277 U.S. 189 (1928) is available from: Cornell Justia
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/Wikisource-logo.svg/38px-Wikisource-logo.svg.png)
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Categories:
- Articles with short description
- Short description with empty Wikidata description
- 1928 in United States case law
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
- Appointments Clause case law
- United States separation of powers case law
- All stub articles
- United States Supreme Court stubs