Scientific American
File:Scientific American (magazine) – March 2005.jpg Cover of the March 2005 issue | |
Discipline | Popular science |
---|---|
Language | English |
Edited by | Laura Helmuth |
Publication details | |
History | Since August 28, 1845 |
Publisher | Springer Nature (United States) |
Frequency | Monthly |
Yes | |
2.142 (2020) | |
Standard abbreviations | |
ISO 4 | Sci. Am. |
Indexing | |
ISSN | 0036-8733 |
LCCN | sf92091111 |
OCLC no. | 796985030 |
Links | |
Scientific American, informally abbreviated SciAm or sometimes SA, is an American popular science magazine. Many famous scientists, including Albert Einstein, have contributed articles to it. In print since 1845, it is the oldest continuously published magazine in the United States. Scientific American is owned by Springer Nature, which in turn is a subsidiary of Holtzbrinck Publishing Group.
History
Scientific American was founded by inventor and publisher Rufus Porter in 1845[1] as a four-page weekly newspaper. The first issue of the large format newspaper was released August 28, 1845.[2]
Throughout its early years, much emphasis was placed on reports of what was going on at the U.S. Patent Office. It also reported on a broad range of inventions including perpetual motion machines, an 1860 device for buoying vessels by Abraham Lincoln, and the universal joint which now can be found in nearly every automobile manufactured. Current issues include a "this date in history" section, featuring excerpts from articles originally published 50, 100, and 150 years earlier. Topics include humorous incidents, wrong-headed theories, and noteworthy advances in the history of science and technology. It started as a weekly publication in August 1845 before turning into monthly in November 1921.[3]
Porter sold the publication to Alfred Ely Beach and Orson Desaix Munn a mere ten months after founding it. Until 1948, it remained owned by Munn & Company.[1] Under Munn's grandson, Orson Desaix Munn III, it had evolved into something of a "workbench" publication, similar to the twentieth-century incarnation of Popular Science.
In the years after World War II, the magazine fell into decline. In 1948, three partners who were planning on starting a new popular science magazine, to be called The Sciences, purchased the assets of the old Scientific American instead and put its name on the designs they had created for their new magazine. Thus the partners—publisher Gerard Piel, editor Dennis Flanagan, and general manager Donald H. Miller, Jr.—essentially created a new magazine.[4] Miller retired in 1979, Flanagan and Piel in 1984, when Gerard Piel's son Jonathan became president and editor; circulation had grown fifteen-fold since 1948. In 1986, it was sold to the Holtzbrinck Publishing Group of Germany, which has owned it until the Springer-Nature merger. In the fall of 2008, Scientific American was put under the control of Holtzbrinck's Nature Publishing Group division.[5]
Donald Miller died in December 1998,[6] Gerard Piel in September 2004 and Dennis Flanagan in January 2005. Mariette DiChristina became editor-in-chief after John Rennie stepped down in June 2009,[5] and stepped down herself in September 2019. In April 2020, Laura Helmuth assumed the role of editor-in-chief.
The magazine is the oldest continually published magazine in the United States.[7][8]
International editions
Scientific American published its first foreign edition in 1890, the Spanish-language La America Cientifica. Publication was suspended in 1905, and another 63 years would pass before another foreign-language edition appeared: In 1968, an Italian edition, Le Scienze, was launched, and a Japanese edition, Nikkei Science , followed three years later. A new Spanish edition, Investigación y Ciencia was launched in Spain in 1976, followed by a French edition, Pour la Science , in France in 1977, and a German edition, Spektrum der Wissenschaft , in Germany in 1978. A Russian edition V Mire Nauki (Russian: «В мире науки») was launched in the Soviet Union in 1983, and continues in the present-day Russian Federation.[9] Kexue (科学, "Science" in Chinese), a simplified Chinese edition launched in 1979, was the first Western magazine published in the People's Republic of China. Founded in Chongqing, the simplified Chinese magazine was transferred to Beijing in 2001. Later in 2005, a newer edition, Global Science (环球科学), was published instead of Kexue, which shut down due to financial problems. A traditional Chinese edition, known as Scientist , was introduced to Taiwan in 2002. The Hungarian edition Tudomány existed between 1984 and 1992. In 1986, an Arabic edition, Oloom Magazine , was published. In 2002, a Portuguese edition was launched in Brazil.
Today, Scientific American publishes 18 foreign-language editions around the globe: Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, Dutch, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Lithuanian (discontinued after 15 issues), Polish, Romanian, Russian, and Spanish.
From 1902 to 1911, Scientific American supervised the publication of the Encyclopedia Americana, which during some of that period was known as The Americana.
Editors
- Rufus Porter (1792–1884), first editor (1845–1847)
- Orson Desaix Munn (1824–1907), second editor (1847–1907)[10]
- Charles Allen Munn (1859–1924), third editor (1907–1924)[11][12]
- Orson Desaix Munn II (1883–1958), fourth editor (1924–1947)
- Dennis Flanagan (1919–2005), fifth editor (1947–1984).[13]
- Jonathan Piel, (1984–1994)
- John Rennie, seventh editor-in-chief (1994–2009)
- Mariette DiChristina, eighth editor-in-chief (2009–2019)
- Laura Helmuth, ninth editor-in-chief (April 2020 – present)[14]
Special issues
- Communications, Computers, and Networks – September 1991
Website
In March 1996, Scientific American launched its own website that included articles from current and past issues, online-only features, daily news, special reports, and trivia, among other things.[citation needed] The website introduced a paywall in April 2019, with readers able to view a few articles for free each month.[15]
Columns
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/71/ScientificAmerican1917-11-03.jpg/300px-ScientificAmerican1917-11-03.jpg)
Notable features have included:
- Martin Gardner's Mathematical Games column
- Douglas Hofstadter's Metamagical Themas
- The Amateur Scientist column
- A. K. Dewdney's Computer Recreations column
- Michael Shermer's Skeptic column
- James Burke's Connections
Television
From 1990 to 2005 Scientific American produced a television program on PBS called Scientific American Frontiers with hosts Woodie Flowers[16] and Alan Alda.[17]
Books
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/ce/%22SCIENTIFIC_AMERICAN_SUPPLEMENT_No._1100_January_30%2C_1897%22_from-_Canet_naval_guns_for_the_Greek_ironclads_%28cropped%29.jpg/300px-%22SCIENTIFIC_AMERICAN_SUPPLEMENT_No._1100_January_30%2C_1897%22_from-_Canet_naval_guns_for_the_Greek_ironclads_%28cropped%29.jpg)
From 1983 to 1997, Scientific American has produced an encyclopedia set of volumes from their publishing division, the Scientific American Library. These books were not sold in retail stores, but as a Book of the Month Club selection priced from $24.95 to $32.95. Topics covered dozens of areas of scientific knowledge and included in-depth essays on: The Animal Mind; Atmosphere, Climate, and Change; Beyond the Third Dimension; Cosmic Clouds; Cycles of Life • Civilization and the Biosphere; The Discovery Of Subatomic Particles; Diversity and the Tropical Rain Forest; Earthquakes and Geological Discovery; Exploring Planetary Worlds; Gravity's Fatal Attraction; Fire; Fossils And The History Of Life; From Quarks to the Cosmos; A Guided Tour Of The Living Cell; Human Diversity; Perception; The Solar System; Sun and Earth; The Science of Words (Linguistics); The Science Of Musical Sound; The Second Law (of Thermodynamics); Stars; Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science.[18]
Scientific American launched a publishing imprint in 2010 in partnership with Farrar, Straus and Giroux.[19]
- DiChristina, Mariette (2017). Scientific American – The Science Behind the Debates. Special Collector's Edition. Winter 2017/2018. Scientific American. A "collection of updated or adapted Scientific American articles and shorter pieces... ". According to editor Andrea Gawrylewski 'The reader will quickly notice a common theme. ... there really is no debate where the science is concerned'". Contributors include Seth Shostak, Paul Offit, Richard Dawkins and Harriet Hall.[20]
Scientific and political debate
In April 1950, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission ordered Scientific American to cease publication of an issue containing an article by Hans Bethe that appeared to reveal classified information about the thermonuclear hydrogen bomb. Subsequent review of the material determined that the AEC had overreacted. The incident was important for the "new" Scientific American's history, as the AEC's decision to burn 3,000 copies of an early press-run of the magazine containing the offending material appeared to be "book burning in a free society" when publisher Gerard Piel leaked the incident to the press.[21]
In its January 2002 issue, Scientific American published a series of criticisms of the Bjørn Lomborg book The Skeptical Environmentalist. Cato Institute fellow Patrick J. Michaels said the attacks came because the book "threatens billions of taxpayer dollars that go into the global change kitty every year".[22] Journalist Ronald Bailey called the criticism "disturbing" and "dishonest", writing, "The subhead of the review section, 'Science defends itself against The Skeptical Environmentalist,' gives the show away: Religious and political views need to defend themselves against criticism, but science is supposed to be a process for determining the facts."[23]
The May 2007 issue featured a column by Michael Shermer calling for a United States pullout from the Iraq War.[24] In response, Wall Street Journal online columnist James Taranto jokingly called Scientific American "a liberal political magazine".[25]
An editorial in the September 2016 issue of Scientific American attacked U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump for "anti-science" attitudes and rhetoric. This marked the first time that the publication forayed into commenting on U.S. presidential politics.[26]
In the October 2020 issue of the magazine, it endorsed Joe Biden for the 2020 presidential election, citing Donald Trump's rejection of scientific evidence, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. In the column reporting the endorsement, the magazine's editors said, "Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly."[27]
Awards
- 2010: IQ Award for the German edition Spektrum der Wissenschaft
Controversy
The publisher was criticized in 2009 when it notified collegiate libraries that yearly subscription prices for the magazine would increase by nearly 500% for print and 50% for online access to $1,500 yearly.[28]
In 2013, Danielle N. Lee, a female scientist who blogged at Scientific American, was called a "whore" in an email by an editor at the science website Biology Online after refusing to write professional content without compensation. When Lee, outraged about the email, wrote a rebuttal on her Scientific American blog, the editor-in-chief of Scientific American, Mariette DiChristina, removed the post, sparking an outrage by supporters of Lee. While DiChristina cited legal reasons for removing the blog, others criticized her for censoring Lee.[29][30][31] The editor at Biology Online was fired after the incident.
The controversy widened in the ensuing days. The magazine's blog editor, Bora Zivkovic, was the subject of allegations of sexual harassment by another blogger, Monica Byrne.[32][33] Although the alleged incident had occurred about a year earlier, editor Mariette DiChristina informed readers that the incident had been investigated and resolved to Byrne's satisfaction.[34] However, the incident involving Lee had prompted Byrne to reveal the identity of Zivkovic, following the latter's support of Lee. Zivkovic responded on Twitter and his own blog, admitting the incident with Byrne had taken place.[35] His blog post apologized to Byrne, and referred to the incident as "singular", stating that his behavior was not "engaged in before or since".[35]
Zivkovic resigned from the board of Science Online, the popular science blogging conference that he co-founded with Anton Zuiker.[36] Following Zivkovic's admission, several prominent female bloggers, including other bloggers for the magazine, wrote their own accounts, alleging additional incidents of sexual harassment, although none of these accounts have been independently investigated yet, nor do they meet either the legal or ethical definition of sexual harassment.[33][37][38][39] A day after these new revelations, Zivkovic resigned his position at Scientific American, according to a press release from the magazine.[40]
Controversy over politicization
A group of scientists, scholars, and pundits have said that Scientific American, originally devoted exclusively to dissemination of scientific knowledge, has gone "woke" and has joined the "social justice" bandwagon.[41] An example of this view is from University of Chicago biology professor Emeritus Jerry Coyne: "Scientific American is changing from a popular-science magazine into a social-justice-in-science magazine" and "it is not science: it's politics and sociology with a Leftist bent."[41] The Wall Street Journal commented on this issue in these terms: "The politicization of formerly respected scientific publications is one of society's more disturbing recent trends and it seems that yet another periodical is willing to surrender its claim to authority."[42] The article quotes Yale professor of social and natural science Nicholas Christakis, "It's just incredible how far [Scientific American]—a periodical I admired—has fallen from its mission to provide accurate, clear, and vivid coverage of science." Christakis points to a post on Jerry Coyne's "Why Evolution is True" website that accuses Scientific American's editor-in-chief of distorting biology in order to promote a social justice goal (equality for the transgender and for marginalized groups).[43]
According to another critic, "Scientific American's descent from respected publication to ideological tabloid is nearly complete. The magazine is now promoting anti-GMO activism under the guise of 'social justice.'"[44] Newsweek cited a Scientific American article titled, "Why the Term 'JEDI' Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion"[45] as an example of a wider pattern of scientific institutions going "woke" and hemorrhaging credibility.[46] According to Skeptic, while the term "woke" originally meant being aware of racial and social issues, it has come to refer to an attitude that interferes with the ability of Scientific American to engage in rational discourse and scientific inquiry.[47]
Scientific American's defenders, such as Princeton anthropologist Agustín Fuentes, defend articles with titles such as "Modern Mathematics Confronts Its White, Patriarchal Past"[48] by asserting that the editorial board at Scientific American has "recognized that times are changing, and including previously excluded and marginalized voices, experiences, and perspectives in their pages is not only the right thing to do, but also the necessary thing to do for a better and more vibrant science of the 21st century. ...Because science has a problem. Systemic gender inequities, sexism, racism, ableism, colonialist histories and their neocolonialist present exist in science."[41]
See also
- 14145 Sciam, asteroid named after Scientific American
- American Scientist
- Discover (magazine)
- Albert Graham Ingalls, former editor and author of an amateur astronomy column
- New Scientist
- Scientific American Mind
References
- ^ a b "Press Room". Scientific American. 2009-08-17. Archived from the original on January 19, 2012. Retrieved 2012-01-24.
- ^ "The Origin of Scientific American". Scientific American. 2009-08-17. Archived from the original on August 27, 2022. Retrieved 2022-08-27.
- ^ "Scientific American archives". onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu. Retrieved 2020-07-21.
- ^ Lewenstein, Bruce V. (1989). "Magazine Publishing and Popular Science after World War II". American Journalism. 6 (4): 218–234. doi:10.1080/08821127.1989.10731208.
- ^ a b Fell, Jason (2009-04-23). "Scientific American Editor, President to Step Down; 5 Percent of Staff Cut". FOLIO. Retrieved 2009-04-26.
- ^ "Donald H. Miller". The New York Times. December 27, 1998.
Miller-Donald H., Jr. Vice President and General Manager of the magazine Scientific American for 32 years until his retirement in 1979. Died on December 22, at home in Chappaqua, NY. He was 84. Survived by his wife of 50 years, Claire; children Linda Itkin, Geoff Kaufman, Sheila Miller Bernson, Bruce Miller, Meredith Davis, and Donald H. Miller, M.D; nine grandchildren and one greatgrandchild; and brother Douglas H. Miller. Memorial service will be held on Saturday, January 30, at 2 PM at the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Northern Westchester in Mount Kisco, NY. In lieu of flowers, contributions may be made to Hospice Care in Westchester, 100 So. Bedford Road, Mount Kisco, NY 10549.
- ^ Edmonds, Rick (27 August 2015). "Can a magazine live forever? Scientific American, at 170, is giving it a shot". Poynter.
- ^ Edmonds, Rick (31 August 2020). "Scientific American, the oldest U.S. magazine, hits another milestone as the appetite for science news heats up". Poynter.
- ^ Чумаков, Валерий (Chumakov, Valery) (24 December 2020). "Ученый предсказал возникновение Сибирского моря. Кого затопит" [The scientist predicted the emergence of the Siberian Sea. Who will be flooded?]. «В мире науки» (in Russian). Retrieved 5 January 2021.
- ^ "A Century of Progress". Time. January 1, 1945. Archived from the original on December 5, 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-15.
Present editor and publisher (third in the line) is Orson Desaix Munn, 61, a patent lawyer, crack bird hunter and fisherman, rumba fancier, familiar figure in Manhattan café society.
- ^ Mott, Frank Luther (1970) [1938]. A History of American Magazines, 1850–1865 (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press. p. 316. ISBN 978-0-674-39551-0. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
- ^ "Munn, Charles Allen". Princeton University Library Finding Aids. Princeton University. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016. Retrieved 9 August 2015.
- ^ Santora, Marc (January 17, 2005). "Dennis Flanagan, 85, Editor of Scientific American for 37 Years". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-01.
Dennis Flanagan, who as editor of Scientific American magazine helped foster science writing for the general reader, died at his home in Manhattan on Friday. He was 85. The cause of death was prostate cancer, according to his wife, Barbara Williams Flanagan. Mr. Flanagan, who worked at Scientific American for more than three decades beginning in 1947, teamed editors directly with working scientists, publishing pieces by leading figures like Albert Einstein, Linus Pauling and J. Robert Oppenheimer.
- ^ "Scientific American appoints Laura Helmuth Editor-in-Chief". Pressroom. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
- ^ "Scientific American Launches New Paywall". @ScientificAmerican. 15 April 2019. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
- ^ "Woodie Flowers, on season 1". Scientific American Frontiers. Chedd-Angier Production Company. 1990–1991. PBS. Archived from the original on 2006.
- ^ "Alan Alda, on season 4". Scientific American Frontiers. Chedd-Angier Production Company. 1993–1994. PBS. Archived from the original on 2006.
- ^ "Scientific American Library". LibraryThing. Retrieved November 24, 2016.
- ^ "FSG, 'Scientific American' Roll Out New Imprint". PublishersWeekly.com. Retrieved 2017-12-10.
- ^ "New and Notable". Skeptical Inquirer. 42 (3): 61. 2018.
- ^ Lewenstein, B. V. (1987). 'Public Understanding of Science' in America, 1945–1965. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, pp. 280–284
- ^ Who Let the Dogs Out at Scientific American? Archived 2007-06-09 at the Wayback Machine, Patrick J. Michaels, January 17, 2002
- ^ Green with Ideology, Ronald Bailey, Reason, May 2002
- ^ Bush's Mistake and Kennedy's Error, Michael Shermer, Scientific American, May 2007
- ^ Sunk or Bunk?, James Taranto, Best of the Web Today, May 18, 2007
- ^ "Donald Trump's Lack of Respect for Science Is Alarming". Scientific American. September 1, 2016. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
- ^ "Scientific American Endorses Joe Biden". Scientific American. September 5, 2020. Retrieved 2020-09-15.
- ^ Howard, Jennifer (October 13, 2009). "College Library Directors Protest Huge Jump in 'Scientific American' Price". Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 2009-10-14.
- ^ Hess, Amanda (October 14, 2013). "Scientific American's Troubling Response to Its Blogger Being Called an 'Urban Whore'". Slate.
- ^ "'Scientific American' draws heat over 'urban whore' blog post". Fox News. October 14, 2013.
- ^ Jaschik, Scott (October 14, 2013). "When Does a Scientist Get Called a Whore?". Inside Higher Ed.
- ^ Byrne, Monica. Zivkovic said of the meeting, "within five minutes, it was clear that SciAm wasn't a good match for her professional goals. [He] stayed for the coffee out of politeness, but found her offputting and uninteresting as a person. So much emphasis has been put on the subject matter of their conversation, but for [Zivkovic] this was no different than talking to an entomologist about insects: all the writing samples she sent we're related to sex and relationships. I was mortified to hear that she understood the conversation as inappropriate, and I did apologize, but not for harassment (there was none), for causing her any discomfort. As a naturalized American, I wasn't raised with all the subtleties that the American madonna/whore culture expouses. And I didn't understand how she could write and talk so freely about sex and yet be offended by our conversation, which was mild in comparison. My interest in her, sexually or otherwise, was zero.""This Happened", October 14, 2013. Retrieved on 24 October 2013.
- ^ a b Helmuth, Laura (October 17, 2013). "Don't Be a Creep". Slate.
- ^ Raeburn, Paul (October 16, 2013). "Scientific American blog editor admits to sexual harassment". Knight Science Journalism at MIT.
- ^ a b Zivkovic, Bora (October 15, 2013). "This happened". A Blog Around The Clock. Archived from the original on October 21, 2013.
- ^ Zuiker, Anton (October 16, 2013). "ScienceOnline Board statement". Archived from the original on October 21, 2013.
- ^ Cooper-White, Macrina (October 17, 2013). "Bora Zivkovic, Scientific American Blog Editor, Responds to Sexual Harassment Allegations".
- ^ Lee, Jane (October 17, 2013). "Shakeup at Scientific American Over Sexual Harassment".
- ^ Sorg, Lisa (October 18, 2013). "The fall of Pittsboro scientist and Scientific American blog editor Bora Zivkovic". Indy Week. Archived from the original on October 25, 2013.
- ^ "Bora Zivkovic resigns from Scientific American" (Press release). Scientific American. October 18, 2013. Archived from the original on October 25, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
- ^ a b c "What the 'anti-woke' crowd gets wrong about the calls for diversity in science". The Princetonian. 2022-09-07. Retrieved 2023-10-10.
- ^ Freeman, James (2023-05-23). "Wokesters in Search of Nonbinary Birds". WSJ. Retrieved 2023-10-13.
- ^ "Once again, ideology distorts science: the editor-in-chief of Scientific American flubs big time, wrongly asserting that sparrows have four sexes". Why Evolution Is True. 2023-05-18. Retrieved 2023-10-13.
- ^ English, Cameron (2021-12-29). "'Woke' Scientific American Goes Anti-GMO". American Council on Science and Health. Retrieved 2023-10-11.
- ^ "Why the Term ‘JEDI’ Is Problematic for Describing Programs That Promote Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion". Scientific American. 2021-09-23. Retrieved 2023-10-13.
- ^ Ferguson, Christopher J. (2022-04-03). "Scientific Institutions Are Going Woke—and Hemorrhaging Credibility". Newsweek. Retrieved 2023-10-12.
- ^ "A Transgender Controversy". Skeptic. 2022-06-09. Retrieved 2023-10-11.
- ^ Crowell, Rachel (2021-08-12). "Modern Mathematics Confronts Its White, Patriarchal Past". Scientific American. Retrieved 2023-10-13.
External links
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4a/Commons-logo.svg/30px-Commons-logo.svg.png)
![](/images/thumb/c/ce/JP-blk-logo-lft-margin-wider3.svg/40px-JP-blk-logo-lft-margin-wider3.svg.png)
- No URL found. Please specify a URL here or add one to Wikidata.
- Scientific American at the HathiTrust Digital Library
- Works by or about Scientific American at Internet Archive
- Works by Scientific American at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- CS1 Russian-language sources (ru)
- Webarchive template wayback links
- Articles with short description
- Monthly journals (infobox)
- Articles with outdated impact factors from 2020
- Articles needing additional references from August 2017
- All articles needing additional references
- Interlanguage link template forcing interwiki links
- Articles containing Russian-language text
- All articles with unsourced statements
- Articles with unsourced statements from April 2019
- Commons category link is defined as the pagename
- Official website missing URL
- HathiTrust Catalog not in Wikidata
- Articles with HathiTrust links
- Articles with Internet Archive links
- Articles with LibriVox links
- AC with 0 elements
- Scientific American
- 1845 establishments in the United States
- Magazines established in 1845
- Magazines published in New York City
- Monthly magazines published in the United States
- Nature Research academic journals
- Popular science magazines
- Science and technology magazines published in the United States