Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel

From Justapedia, unleashing the power of collective wisdom
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel logo.svg
Logo of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel, intended to evoke the five science drivers of particle physics

The Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5) is a scientific advisory panel tasked with recommending plans for U.S. investment in particle physics research over the next ten years, on the basis of various funding scenarios. The P5 is a temporary subcommittee of the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP), which serves the Department of Energy's Office of Science and the National Science Foundation. As of 2014, the panel was chaired by Steven Ritz of the University of California, Santa Cruz.[1] The next P5 panel is scheduled to be convened in September, 2022.[2]

2014 Report

In 2013, HEPAP was asked to convene a panel (the P5) to evaluate research priorities in the context of anticipated developments in the field globally in the next 20 years. Recommendations were to be made on the basis of three funding scenarios for high-energy physics:[3]

  • A constant funding level for the next three years followed by an annual 2% increase, relative to the FY2013 budget
  • A constant funding level for the next three years followed by an annual 3% increase, relative to the proposed FY2014 budget
  • An unconstrained budget

Science Drivers

In May 2014, the first P5 report since 2008 was released. The 2014 report identified five "science drivers"—goals intended to inform funding priorities—drawn from a year-long discussion within the particle physics community. These science drivers are:[4]

Recommendations

In pursuit of the five science drivers, the 2014 report identified three "high priority large category" projects meriting significant investment in the FY2014–2023 period, regardless of the broader funding situation: the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider (a proposed upgrade to the Large Hadron Collider located at CERN in Europe); the International Linear Collider (a proposed electron-positron collider, likely hosted in Japan); and the Long Baseline Neutrino Facility (an expansion of the proposed Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment (that was renamed the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment), to be constructed at Fermilab in Illinois and at the Homestake Mine in South Dakota).[5]

In addition to these large projects, the report identified numerous smaller projects with potential for near-term return on investment, including the Mu2e experiment, second- and third-generation dark matter experiments, particle-physics components of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), cosmic microwave background experiments, and a number of small neutrino experiments.

The report made several recommendations for significant shifts in priority, namely:[4]

  • An increase in the proportion of the high-energy physics budget devoted to construction of new facilities, from 15% to 20%-25%[5]
  • An expansion in scope of the Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment to a major international collaboration, with redirection of resources from other R&D projects to the development of higher powered proton beams for the neutrino facility
  • Increased funding for second-generation dark matter detection experiments
  • Increased funding of cosmic microwave background (CMB) research

The panel stressed that the most conservative of the funding scenarios considered would endanger the ability of the U.S. to host a major particle physics project while maintaining the necessary supporting elements.[4]

Impact and Outcomes Since 2014

A goal of the 2014 P5 exercise was to provide Congress with a science-justified roadmap for project funding. Five years later, in 2019, the Department of Energy Office of Science declared:[6] "Congressional appropriations reflect strong support for P5. Language in appropriations reports have consistently recognized community’s efforts in creating and executing the P5 report strategy" and "P5 was wildly successful." From 2016 to 2020, the High Energy Physics (HEP) budget grew from less than $800 million to more than $1 billion.[7]

However, members of the HEP community were concerned because the increased funding went primarily toward projects, while funding for core research and technology programs, which was also supported by P5, declined from $361 million to $316 million.[7] In 2020, an assessment of progress of the P5-defined program produced by the High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP) concluded: [8] "While investments over the past 5 years have focused on project construction, it will be fundamentally important to balance the components of the HEP budget to continue successful execution of the P5 plan. Operations of the newly constructed experiments require full support to reap their scientific goals. The HEP research program also needs strong support to fully execute the plan, throughout the construction, operations, and data analysis phases of the experiments, and to lay a foundation for the future."

As of 2022, several of the "Large Projects" identified as priorities by the 2014 P5 had fallen considerably behind schedule or been affected by cost gaps, including:

2023 Report

The next P5 panel will be convened in September, 2022.[2], and will report in 2023. As was the case for the 2014 report, input to P5 comes from the Snowmass Process. This community study was held in 2020-2022.


References

  1. ^ "About P5". Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (P5). U.S. Particle Physics. Archived from the original on 2014-05-25.
  2. ^ a b "DOE Status Update, Jim Siegrist" (PDF). High Energy Physics Advisory Panel March 7, 2022 Agenda.
  3. ^ U.S. Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation (2013), [untitled letter to Andrew Lankford] (PDF)
  4. ^ a b c Report of the Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel (PDF), May 2014
  5. ^ a b Bloom, Ken (May 27, 2014). "P5 and the fifth dimension that Einstein missed". Quantum Diaries. Interactions.org.
  6. ^ Crawford, Glenn. "DOE Self-Assessment: P5 Implementation" (PDF). High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting May 30-31, 2019. Department of Energy Office of Science. Retrieved 23 April 2022.
  7. ^ a b Thomas, Will (December 16, 2020). "Particle Physicists Feel Squeeze From Major Projects". FYI: American Institute of Physics. Retrieved 23 April 2022.
  8. ^ "HEPAP Assessment of Progress on 2014 P5 Report" (PDF). Department of Energy Office of Science. Retrieved 23 April 2022.
  9. ^ Adrian Cho (March 29, 2022). "Trying to stay ahead of competition, U.S. pares down troubled $3 billion neutrino experiment". Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  10. ^ Bernstein, Maxwell (March 24, 2022). "Straws, crystals and the quest for new subatomic physics". Fermilab News.
  11. ^ "PIP-II: An international effort breaking new ground in particle physics". Innovation News Network. March 4, 2022.
  12. ^ Will Thomas (November 17, 2021). "Budget Tensions Compounding in High Energy Physics". FYI, American Institute of Physics.
  13. ^ Michael Banks (March 1, 2022). "Panel calls on physicists to 'shelve' notion of Japan hosting the International Linear Collider". Physics World, IOP Publishing.

External links