User talk:Justme
.jpg)
DS AWARE NOTICE
If you came here to alert me to DS for post-1932 American Politics (AP2), climate change, BLP, GMO, or anything else included in Wikipedia's arbitration enforcement nightmare, please be aware that Atsme was my former self, and we don't do that crap here on Justapedia. We opted for common sense instead.
Fast Company, Slate, the WGBH (FM) podcast during WikiCon2019 at MIT where a few Wikipedians were interviewed, and Innovation Hub.
"What is the lure of extremist rhetoric in democratic controversy? After all, most citizens are not extremists. Part of the lure lies in the fact that it is easier to believe passionately in a value or cause without regard to subtlety, reasoned argument, probabilistic evidence, and vigorously tested scientific theory or fact. Expressions of single-minded visions for solving problems and changing society can make complexity and uncertainty, frustration and regret, all appear to evaporate. Another part of the lure is that having comrades-in-argument is comforting." ~Amy Gutman (excerpt from The Lure & Dangers of Extremist Rhetoric)
If you see your glass as half-empty, pour it into a smaller glass and stop bitching!
“The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of the masses.” ~Malcolm X (1963)
"ALGORITHM-RANKED search results and social media news feeds have contributed to the creation of ‘echo chambers’ and ‘filter bubbles’, where people reinforce their beliefs rather than dialogue across differences." ~ World trends in freedom of expression and media development, global report 2017/2018 pg 67 UNESCO.
We must wear our critical thinking caps, and try not to repeat history as a single incident may parallel various incidents throughout the wide spectrum of politics.
If you get an editor blocked or t-banned for expressing their opinion, then you're not helping to build the encyclopedia. You're destroying it. Atsme 💬 📧 15:18, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
From expressed opinions giant encyclopedias grow..."Ball of Fire" (the link originated in a post by Softlavender shared by EEng in 2019.) 11:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
ARCA: As a separate issue, anything that relies on DS will fail. The only way forward is for arb com to directly regulate conduct by removing prejudiced editors and admins, either from an area or from WP, not trying to adopt rules about just how disruptive they can be. ~DGG
Signpost News from the WMF: Our role is to accurately describe the real world, with the hoped-for result that those wishing to improve it will use the information wisely. Our job is not direct action, except in defense of our right to freely publish. ~DGG
In fact, the belief that our thoughts can influence our actions is so basic to our entire idea of ourselves and our place in nature, and is so essential to our actual functioning in this world, that any suggestion that this idea is false would become plausible only under extremely coercive conditions, such as its incompatibility with basic physics. But no such coercion exists. Contemporary physical theory does allow our experiences, per se, to be truly efficacious and non-reducible: our experiences are elements of the causal structure that do necessary things that nothing else in the theory can do. Thus science, if pursued with sufficient care, demands no cloistering of disciplines, or interpretation as user illusions of the apparent causal effects of our conscious thoughts upon our physical actions. ~ Henry P. Stapp, (May 1999), Physics Division, Berkeley National Laboratory, title="Attention, Intention, and Will in Quantum Physics", published in the Journal of Consciousness Studies, : 35 .
if a friend's heart is pure
because trust is earned
and I am concerned
that what we know
isn't always so.
Burma-shave
-3580144.png)
"It doesn’t make sense to hire smart people and tell them what to do; we hire smart people so they can tell us what to do."
– Steve Jobs
Following are a few links to freely download CC0 (PD) images:
I'm leaving this link for any editor who may be feeling a little stressed on the job. It has a very calming effect. Relax - enjoy - and once your blood pressure is back where it should be, resume editing.
“Scientific results are always provisional, susceptible to being overturned by some future experiment or observation. Scientists rarely proclaim an absolute truth or absolute certainty. Uncertainty is inevitable at the frontiers of knowledge.” ~ National Geographic Magazine
Atsme's contribution to science:
Life is all about having fun so if you're not living, you're not having any fun. Atsme Talk 📧
The most useful used skill I've discovered for Alexa - Alexa, call me.
Now, if I can only get it to work with my keys.
Autocorrect has become my worst enema.
On a sign at a restaurant in Texas:
Treat your Mom to a Margarita! You're probably the reason she drinks.
Research reveals that people who drink heavily are much more likely to experience retrospective memory loss.
Isn't that why we drink?
I can fix stupid, but it's gonna hurt.
I have never faked a sarcasm in my life!
I'm not insulting you, I’m describing you.
I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
(attributed to Mark Twain, but could have been Grant Allen)
Atsme is not just a writer, she's award winning...she won a place in the psycho ward.
Ah, the effect of being affected while being affected by the effectiveness of the effect of the affectation of the effector's effective affecting effect. Infective, no? jc37
 Archives |
| Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11 |
Make sure your Viagra prescription says Made In the USA
You don't want Russia meddling in your erections.
Shortly after a complete remodel of the master bathroom, a sign hung on the door:
DO NOT DISTURBI am busy masterbathing in my new tub.
Dr. Rick Rigsby’s commencement address. I hope you will listen to it.
When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. All the pain is felt by others.
Same thing happens when you're stupid.
I don’t know how much I don’t know because there’s no way to gage how much I don’t know when I don’t know what it is I don’t know, so stop telling me I should've known.
There has to be some merit to "ignorance is bliss" Atsme✍🏻📧
People who confuse the words "burro" and "burrow" don't know their ass from a hole in the ground.
Vir Das on racism
And then comes the time when you finally realize that you don't know shit.
"I come from an environment where, if you see a snake, you kill it. At GM, if you see a snake, the first thing you do is go hire a consultant on snakes. Then you get a committee on snakes, and then you discuss it for a couple of years. The most likely course of action is -- nothing. You figure, the snake hasn't bitten anybody yet, so you just let him crawl around on the factory floor. We need to build an environment where the first guy who sees the snake kills it." ~Ross Perot
We need to rethink some of the terms we use in the English language.
Awaken with JB, episode #88, he is woke.
"I'm sorry, but you two appear to be: treating each other civilly accepting the possibility that your own actions might not have been correct trying to work out the best thing to do for the project without concern for you[r] own egos. I don't know where you people think you are, but you definitely don't understand how WP:AN is supposed to work. Where's the disrespect? The attacking of each other's characters and motives? The entertaining temper tantrums? Please immediately review other threads on this noticeboard, so you can better participate in WP:AN. Right now you look like rookies. I don't do AFD, so I have no opinion on whether to relist or not (couldn't hurt, tho, right?), but that's a good example of what should be going on here; useless babble without any helpful outcome. --barneca (talk) 9:57 pm, 16 September 2008, Tuesday (10 years, 8 months, 12 days ago) (UTC−5)[1]
To me, "drink responsibly" means don't spill it.
While this list of sources is really good and does establish "commonly used by reliable sources" I think we should additionally ask ourselves - what added benefit is there to Wikipedia saying it "in our own voice" as against simply reporting in a neutral manner that it is common for his comments to be described as racist. As of this moment, we are engaging in what I think is admirable short-term restraint. We say in the lede "He has a history of making controversial [weasel words] comments." That's fine as far as it goes, because 'controversial comments' is true, and is neither positive nor negative as an evaluation. Sometimes controversial comments are good, sometimes they are bad. Fine. But we are at the same time here being too cautious, I think, in that we fail to inform the reader as to why the comments are controversial. Is he saying things that might be controversial in Iowa like "Gay marriage should be legal" or "Marijuana prohibition has done more harm than good"? No, actually. So I think we should cautiously say something like "He has a history of making comments that have commonly been referred to as racist.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]" Well, maybe 9 footnotes is excessive, but you see my point. We have more than enough to make the point that the reader needs to know, and I think the point is stronger than if we simply say, in our own voice, that he has a history of making racist comments.
~Jimbo Wales (talk) 9:57 am, 19 June 2018, Tuesday (19 days ago) (UTC−5)
- And today Justapedia editors have the hindsight to know
BLPs wherein a subject's work, beliefs or ideologies are perhaps more controversial than the actual subject, should not become focused on bolstering and subsequently refuting the subject's views or theories rather than actually defining the subject. In many cases this may in fact be due to the subject trying to push their own ideas, while others work diligently to refute them, but many such cases involve editors who have no affiliation with the subject other than a personal belief/disbelief in their work. A person's biography is not a good place to debate scientific theory or ideological beliefs; such debates belong in the articles that focus on those topics. For BLPs, it is enough to simply state what their views are and link to the articles which expand on those views. ~ (quote by Zaereth edited for brevity; Jimbo Wales agreed with Zaereth’s explanation.)
I'd like to add that I don't mind a little bit of personal chit-chat here about politics, I'd like to always seek to tie it back to Wikipedia. We have chosen a very tough job: NPOV. Dislike for the President, fear about things that are happening in the world, may make it emotionally harder to remain neutral, but remain neutral we must. I happen to personally think that given the decline in quality of the media across the board (there are still fantastic journalists out there, but overall the landscape isn't great) the best way for us to help the world heal is neutrality.
--[2] Jimbo Wales (talk)] 3:12 pm, 8 January 2019, Tuesday (UTC−6)
Jimbo's response to an editor's statement to not cite The Daily Mail as a source in articles because it has been deprecated.
"No, that is not true. It is true that the Daily Mail is generally prohibited as a source, but in Wikipedia terminology that does not mean an absolute ban. Exceptions to the general rule can and do exist, per WP:IAR as well as general common sense in specific circumstances."
[3]--Jimbo Wales
“I have no beef with my colleagues, many of whom I admire and are friends,” Sullivan tweeted. “The underlying reasons for the split are pretty self-evident.” But he expressed solidarity with Weiss: “The mob bullied and harassed a young woman for thoughtcrimes. And her editors stood by and watched.” (Excerpt from NYTimes)
"Writing for the opponent is an important trait of good editors. They must be able to divorce themselves from their own POV so much that they can bend over backwards to aid in the writing of content which documents views they do not like. They must never block the inclusion of content which opposes their own POV or political positions. If they cannot do this, they should recuse themselves from the topic and edit in other areas. Editors who are unwilling or unable to write for the opponent are incapable of truly understanding or abiding by the NPOV policy. As such they will always cause problems." (see JP:NPOV means neutral editors, not neutral content)
Please be aware that you are legally responsible for all of your contributions, edits, and re-use of Wikimedia content under the laws of the United States of America and other applicable laws (which may include the laws where you live or where you view or edit content). This means it is important that you use caution when posting content. In light of this responsibility, we have some rules about what you cannot post, most of which is either for your own protection or for the protection of other users like yourself. Please keep in mind that the content we host is for general informational purposes only, so if you need expert advice for a particular question (such as medical, legal, or financial issues), you should seek the help of a licensed or qualified professional. We also include other important notices and disclaimers, so please read these Terms of Use in their entirety. WMF Terms of Use
My views on this are quite simple. An admin telling a user to "grow the fuck up" is absolutely unacceptable under any circumstances and is ground for immediate desysopping. If we care about having a serious, thoughtful, kind, adult and mature community (which I assume was the sentiment behind that unseemly outburst) then we have to model that behavior ourselves as admins. There's a bit of sad irony in behaving in a juvenile and bullying fashion in an attempt to get others to behave better. Bwilkins, I recommend that you turn in your bit and take a break from being an admin for 6 months and then return if you feel you can handle the job in a more responsible fashion.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- For better digestion, I drink beer.
- For appetite loss, I drink white wine.
- If my blood pressure is too low, I drink red wine.
- For high blood pressure, I drink scotch.
- When I have a cold, I drink schnapps.”
- My friend asked, “When do you drink water?”
- I replied, “I’ve never been that sick.”
When I was young, I decided to enroll in medical school.
On the entrance exam, we were asked to unscramble the letters...PNEIS...to form the name of an important human body part that is most useful when erect. The students who answered SPINE are doctors today, and the rest of us are editing Wikipedia.
Four worms were placed in 4 separate test tubes:
- 1st in beer
- 2nd in wine
- 3rd in whiskey
- 4th in mineral water
The next day, the teacher shows the results:
- The 1st worm in beer - dead.
- The 2nd in wine - dead.
- The 3rd in whiskey - dead.
- The 4th in mineral water - alive and in good health.
The teacher asks the class:
- What did you learn from this experience?
A student responds:
- Whoever drinks beer, wine and whiskey does not have worms.
- I know a guy who's addicted to brake fluid. He says he can stop any time.
- I stayed up all night to see where the sun went. Then it dawned on me.
- This girl said she recognized me from the vegetarian club, but I'd never met herbivore.
- ...sarcasm burned calories.
- ...you knew, you would know.
- ...closed minds came with closed mouths.
- ...mosquitos sucked fat instead of blood.
- ...the good died young, we'd be here forever.
- ...my teeth were as white as my legs.
- ...more people were fluent in silence.
Hiker to park ranger, "Ranger, how does one survive a bear attack?"
Ranger replies, Easy...remove the "f" from the word "way".
Hiker responds, "There's no "f" in "way".
Ranger replies, "Exactly."
- It is much easier to ride a horse in the direction it is going. ~Abraham Lincoln
- It gets late early out there. ~Yogi Bera
- There comes a time on Wikipedia when it's important to know when to stop arguing with editors, and simply let them be wrong. Atsme📞📧
- Nodding the head does not row the boat. — Irish Proverb
- Make haste slowly. —Kikkoman
- Be who you are, say what you mean, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind. — Bernard Baruch
- Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want." —Randy Pausch
- I have made this letter longer than usual, because I lack the time to make it short. ~ Blaise Pascal
- Patience is a virtue. Give karma a chance.
- I may not be young enough to know everything, but I'm old enough to not believe everything.
- A tip for longevity: Never believe the impossible can't happen to you.
- “It is well known that human choices are affected by the way in which a question is phrased.” ~ Benedetto de Martino
How Woke Are We? (Wikipedia, not Justapedia)
”The encyclopedia’s reliance on outside sources, primarily newspapers, means it will be only as diverse as the rest of the media—which is to say, not very.” [1]
- Re: the above Bloomberg article, "not very" is quite accurate, but I remain cautiously optimistic that once RECENTISM dies down, things will greatly improve.
"Since decisions are by those who participate in a localized discussion, leaving cedes the decision-making power to those willing to engage in the least logical and sane response. This incentivizes not just obsessive but also belligerent behavior and even harassment, and empowers those privileged with the time and resources to engage in this behavior. Minor quibbles about grammar is one thing, but these techniques are frequently used by political ideologues, ethnic nationalists, and conspiracy theorists. Professor Bryce Peake called this the “hegemony of the asshole consensus.” [2]
- No need to elaborate further on that particular quote. Some will be able to relate, whereas others will find it insulting. For more info, see Wikipedia @ 20. You may decide to submit your own essay. Atsme Talk 📧 14:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Sources
|
|---|
|
|
Archives |
| Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11 |
Finding bugs
.jpg)
Just working on a few bugs...and then it's time for me to work out. Justme (talk) 09:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Are you the founder of Justapedia?
Just wondering.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SrGarga (talk • contribs) 14:49, January 4, 2025 (UTC)
Should we add a deaths section to 2025 and upcoming years articles?
I think this could sound like a good idea since the years articles from English Wikipedia doesn't have its deaths section anymore, but I don't want to be the only one to make these changes, I'm gonna need some help, but I'll still contribute to that. What do you think? — SrGarga (talk) 13:59, 6 January 2025 (AST)
- I think perhaps in time, it would make a good JP:Project but for now, updating only the bios should be done either as they occur, as a few editors have done–at least until we get a bot script or AI ready to do it. Justme 💬 📧 14:03, 6 January 2025 (AST)
Heads up!!
Check it out! Merry Christmas — LarrySanger (talk) 22:34, 9 January 2025 (AST)
California fires
I nominated Timeline of January 2025 Southern California wildfires for speedy delete. I see the editor forked another article after I started a new article. Bambino 📢 📩 13:49, 10 January 2025 (AST)
- I fixed my screw-up so redo your draft. Apologies. Oh, and we are not going to speedy delete Merkle's timeline article about those fires. You will have to do an AfD. Justme 💬 📧 14:00, 10 January 2025 (AST)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Jews in Greenland has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Justapedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Justme 💬 📧 16:40, 15 January 2025 (AST)Welcoming
When you welcome new users you don make it == Welcome! == (Your welcome)
You just say welcome. — Atlas (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2025 (AST)
- Atlas, when a new user already has a welcome template on their UTP, we don't add more templates below it as you did because they cannot reply to templates. Our welcome templates already contain the information necessary for new users, and some of those types of templates are used for "headers", not sections. If you want to be part of the welcoming committee, that's great - be the first to welcome our new users with a welcome template, but do not add more header templates after someone has already included the initial welcome header because they cannot reply in the same thread as a header template which is what you added. They have to start a new section below the header. Justme 💬 📧 12:26, 16 January 2025 (AST)
I wasn’t talking about that one. I saw another one you did without a header. — Atlas (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2025 (AST)
Jordan Neely
For an encyclopedia with a relatively small contributor base I think it makes sense to show deference to the show-runner. That is you. You are probably paying most or all of the bills, right now. I plan to offer to chip in with a modest monthly contribution, soon. Even then I plan to show deference.
May I ask you for some clarification as to what happened to the Jordan Neely article? Am I correct that someone here started a Jordan Neely article, that you then moved it to draft space, because you thought it wasn't ready for article space, and then you subsequently changed the draft to a redirect to Daniel Penny#Neely's background, deleting the draft article, in the process?
I wrote a section Justapedia:The Exchange#Redirection to subsections within other articles... voicing my general concern over the practice of redirecting to subsections within other articles.
Wikipedia's BLP1E makes a big exception for people who, even though they became known for one event, when their role in that event was so significant they ended up measuring up to notability. I did a Google search for Neely. I think I see lots of indications Neely measures up to notability.
Deference.
I participated in the AFD on Bible story. Justapedia does have them. I am not going to challenge your authority to delete articles, outside of AFD, on your sole judgement, but, in order to understand our processes here, I would be interested in an explanation.
Thanks — Geo Swan (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2025 (AST)
- Thank you so much for bringing this to my attention, Geo Swan, and my apologies for the tardy response. Big things are happening behind the scenes. Better yet, we anticipate even bigger things after we attend this event. As for our growth here on Justapedia, I've long since learned not to interrupt the enemy when they're making mistakes but I do believe in making it public in our Feature Showcase, so bring us some candidates. If you believe Jordan Neely should be a stand alone article, that's your decision. You are aware of JP's requirements for neutrality and objectivity, and that we want readers to make their own decisions based on the inclusion of the facts along with a balance of significant views with inline citations. I've got to get back to work on the graphics and other material we need for Feb 5th, as well as for interviews coming up soon following (to be announced on our x.com page). Justapedia's traffic has increased so let's hope we get some big sponsors so we can finish our data center and speed-up the downloads!! Happy editing!! (forgot to sign so redo ping Geo Swan...) –– Justme 💬 📧 11:05, 23 January 2025 (AST)
Page notices
If it's ok with you, I'll make a list of page notices that need to be deleted when I come across them:
Is there a Discord server for Justapedia?
Just wondering :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SrGarga (talk • contribs) 08:58, February 27, 2025 (UTC)
- Hmmm...there used to be, but I went ahead and created another one - Justapedia's server - it has our circle logo in red-orange. Justme 💬 📧 11:48, 27 February 2025 (AST)
Category issue
I tried to create the category "Stubs created by Justapedists in 2025" and hot cat is not working. — Factsfirst (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2025 (AST)
Need upload rights
Hi, Justme - since western heritage is alive again, I created an article about a old cowboy in Texas and I need to upload some fair use images (historic, actually). Can you grant me upload rights? — BorisX (talk) 10:20, 11 March 2025 (AST)
- Ok - Justme 💬 📧 10:42, 11 March 2025 (AST)
- BorisX - nice job on that article. Decker doesn't live too far from me - maybe 1-1/2 hrs. I was in his neck of the woods last year or year before last to see some horse show friends who moved down the street from him. We met at the Cowboy Emporium, and I took some iPhone photos. I'll upload what I can to Commons, but I'd have to check into some of the newer images. They should be old enough to either be out of or void of copyright. Under copyright laws that were in effect before 1978, a work that was published without copyright notice fell into the public domain. If the work did not include the word “Copyright” or a © (a “c” in a circle) and the name of the copyright owner, the work would enter the public domain. This rule was repealed; copyright notice is not required for works first published after March 1, 1989 (although works first published prior to that date must still include notice). I went ahead and uploaded before I finished typing this notice so here's the link. The other photos may fall under fair use, so I'll upload here. Justme 💬 📧 14:04, 11 March 2025 (AST)
Created a new article for History of Hamas
Need to bother you again - I have a new article to replace the forked article History of Hamas - please delete the forked article. — BorisX (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2025 (AST)
Thank you
First for helping me learn how to edit. I finally got around to creating. Please keep promoting Justapedia on Bonaire as you have been. Second, I want to upload a new image of Alex Villalobos but I'm still at Captcha level. I can email the image to you, or maybe you can promote me so I can upload it myself? Doesn't matter to me. — JanieDid (talk) 09:48, 30 March 2025 (AST)
- I can fix that problem. — Factsfirst (talk) 10:03, 30 March 2025 (AST)
Can you (or anyone else here) review or proofread Draft:Vahid Beheshti so to make it ready for publication? Thank you in advance.— Ron Merkle (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2025 (AST)
- Your draft is published. You need to add categories, and specify if it's forked which means it contains original material by the author or if it's a new article about the same topic (forked article means there were no significant changes in the lead or body). If it's a completely rewritten article, then it's new. Just because it's about the same person doesn't make it a fork that needs attribution. Please understood that because topics are not copyrightable - only the way an author presents it is copyrightable. The topic or person an article is about is not copyrightable, neither are ideas. You are not obligated to attribute as forked if it's rewritten entirely. Also, don't use more than 3 citations for material that might be challenged, and please don't use the group citation template. Use Citer toolforge or our Citation Generator under Tools in the left margin. BTW...that is a good article about a great topic!! Justme 💬 📧 20:25, 11 April 2025 (AST)
This is a test using +
In user prefs, you can choose the + symbol for one of your tabs instead of using the edit source tab. I used the + tab this time, and there's no edit summary bar, which is a problem. Justme 💬 📧 13:28, 13 April 2025 (AST)
Upgrade
Hey Justme - can you make me a template editor? Do I pass the test? Cheers! — StandiferG (talk) 10:12, 2 May 2025 (AST)
- I do promise. Here's proof - Independence Day (Israel) – does it work? Cheers! — StandiferG (talk) 12:29, 4 May 2025 (AST)
Waiting for response
Hello,
I am waiting for your response in Talk:Deir Yassin massacre before proceeding with adding the list again (in case of no objections) — ZeroDoxx (talk) 13:39, 6 May 2025 (AST)
New JustaProject
Hello,
Can you please make a new JustaProject for Israel-Palestine conflict? I posess great knowledge in the conflict and due to constantly debating it, I know both sides claims and how to present them equally. I think I would be a good candidate to manage the project. The project would have a list of biased articles or potentially biased articles - as well as all the other things that usual projects (like on wikipedia) have. Please let me know if you have any more questions about what I envision the project to be, and how we can make the visions possible — ZeroDoxx (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2025 (AST)
- Hi @ZeroDoxx,
- Thank you for your message and for showing interest in contributing to this important topic. We currently have a page titled Justapedia:Project Israel, which already touches on related areas. It does need some updates, and I’ll be working on refining it shortly.
- If you’d like to create a separate Justapedia Project focused on the Israel–Palestine conflict, you’re absolutely welcome to do so. Justapedia is an open space where everyone is encouraged to collaborate and build this encyclopedia the right way — together and with balance. We appreciate your initiative and look forward to your contributions. — Shahadat (talk) 02:34, 9 May 2025 (AST)
Forked articles
Hi, Justme - (pinging Factsfirst if you're too busy) - I prodded 2 forked articles State of Palestine, and Islamberg because I rewrote both of them (you are right about Grok, great tool) so we can replace those forks. Thanks ahead of time! — GracieCasey (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2025 (AST)
User rights upgrade
Hi. Can my privileges be upgraded to include createarticle? — Enki (talk) 12:34, 29 May 2025 (AST)
- You can create an article at JP:AfC now, but I went ahead and gave you editor rights. Justme 💬 📧 22:20, 29 May 2025 (AST)
Need delete of fork to make way for new bio
Pam Bondi is the article - it's completely rewritten in my TextEdit program. I'll tag it for speedy. Bambino 📢 📩 13:03, 9 June 2025 (AST)
Draft:Luigi Mangione
You moved the article I created on Luigi Mangione to draft space. Recently a distinct Luigi Mangione article has been created. I'd like to compare my work to the new version, but Draft:Luigi Mangione no longer exists.
I request userification of my original version. — Geo Swan (talk) 12:29, 12 June 2025 (AST)
- Hi, Geo Swan - hope all is well on your end. Missed seeing you around. You can view your draft at User:Geo_Swan/Luigi_Mangione. Justme 💬 📧 20:20, 12 June 2025 (AST)